Dusan Lajovic vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Jun at 12:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Lajovic vs R. Pacheco Mendez

SRB
0
Win
Played
0
Win

MEX
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lajovic 0 - 0 Mendez
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lajovic | 0 |
| Mendez | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
D. Lajovic vs R. P. Mendez H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 15 | Titles | 3 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Lajovic vs R. P. Mendez Match Preview:
- Regarding second serve performance in the last six months, Lajovic holds a slight edge, winning 44.14% compared to Mendez's 43.26%, indicating a small advantage in potentially pivotal moments.
- On returning opponents' second serves, Mendez shows a stronger ability, winning 47.14% of points, while Lajovic captures 41.99%, suggesting Mendez may have an upper hand in break opportunities.
- Both players perform similarly in saving breakpoints, with Lajovic saving 54.57% and Mendez saving 54.14%, making this metric less decisive.
- Lajovic lags in match success over the past year, having won 45.45% of his matches, while Mendez has secured victories in 55.22%, illustrating higher consistency from Mendez.
- Lajovic excels on clay with a 59% win rate, but struggles on grass, whereas Mendez displays his best results on indoor hard courts at 67%, though clay is his least successful surface.
- When examining their playing levels, Lajovic has operated more frequently on the Main tour, with a 40% win rate, whereas Mendez has engaged mostly in Challengers/ITF events, with a 47.37% success rate.
- Historically, Lajovic has won their prior head-to-head, winning both sets in their sole encounter, indicating a psychological advantage in direct matchups.
- Lajovic competes against higher-ranked opponents (average rank 114.55) compared to Mendez (average rank 309.31), suggesting Lajovic faces tougher competition regularly.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Mendez shows a better success rate at 50%, compared to Lajovic's 38%, highlighting Mendez's resilience.
- Both have comparable break point conversion rates, with Lajovic at 31.79% and Mendez at 31.21%, indicating equal efficiency under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):
As we weigh the strengths and weaknesses of both players, it becomes evident that despite Lajovic's extensive experience on the Main tour, Mendez's slightly superior recent form and higher match win rate over the last year position him competitively in this matchup.
Mendez's ability to win more points on return and in deciding sets could be critical in tipping the scale in his favor, especially if the contest hinges on break opportunities or extends to a decisive set.
Lajovic's history of winning their past encounter provides a psychological edge; however, the difference in the level of competition each has faced suggests that Mendez might be underestimated coming into this match.
The analysis of these factors indicates that Mendez has a slight edge and is thus the likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Dusan Lajovic vs Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
D. Lajovic Recent Matches Played
R. P. Mendez Recent Matches Played

D. Lajovic vs R. P. Mendez Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.69% (553/477) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.08% (80/83) |
| 52.77% (1316/1178) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.34% (186/191) |
| 50.98% (12253/11780) | Games Win/Loss | 50.62% (1805/1761) |
| 48.96% (118/123) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.11% (37/34) |
| 59.17% (358/247) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.35% (39/47) |
| 46.31% (69/80) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 22.86% (8/27) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 3099 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1451 | Total Double Faults | 488 |
| 1:22:32 | Average Match Time | 1:41:23 |
| 484.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 348.02 |
| 66% (41990/63909) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6445/10563) |
| 68% (28678/41990) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4378/6445) |
| 52% (11485/21919) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2098/4117) |
| 40% (2337/5836) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (445/1107) |
| 38% (24096/63906) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4382/10966) |
| 38.89% (35/55) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 51.25% (82/78) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.37% (18/20) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 48.62% (176/186) | Main Tour W/L | 11.11% (1/8) |
| 63.87% (152/86) | Challenger W/L | 39.58% (38/58) |
| 63.83% (90/51) | Futures W/L | 74.00% (37/13) |
| 55% (509/923) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (79/162) |
| 38% (34/90) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (174/351) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (26/56) |
| 51% (162/317) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (24/51) |
| 83% (584/487) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (78/65) |
| 16% (584/96) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (78/13) |
| 14% (446/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (85/14) |